On Wed, 4 Jul 2001 15:23:50 +0800, "Jeremy" <nobody@nodomain.com> wrote: >My personal experience from trying to port my App is that classical GDI, >specifically anything to do with Bitmaps and compatible dc, runs at less >than 5% of the speed of a native windows App. Surprising but I have not really benchmarked this part of Win api. >Secondarily, there are faults in the implementation of some GDI functions, >especially fonts, but even simple line drawing and polyfilling is faulty. Not surprising at all, Gdi api is huge. >This does not seem to be of concern to any of the developers as my previous >posts on the subject have been ignored. I'm not sure if there is anyone >actively supporting GDI functionality. Or at least not anyone watching this >newsgroup. IMHO Wine would need at least 4 times the number of contributors it has to fulfill the dreams of people using it. Ideally I'd like to look into your problems but I have to do other things including winning some money from time to time. All the time I dedicate to Wine since several weeks is spent trying to find all the showstoppers the recent bunch of window management patches has created. Gerard _______________________________________________ wine-users mailing list wine-users@winehq.com http://www.winehq.com/mailman/listinfo/wine-users
