Good day!
This is up for discussion on wine-devel, but if nobody has a better way
to suggest, it is better than what was there. I attached one in case
the inlined one folds. Is that reasonable? Or would you rather I
didn't?
Lawson
ChangeLog:
* dlls/ole32/storage32.c:
Lawson Whitney <lawson_whitney@juno.com>
Fix off-by-one error in placing trailing \0.
diff -ur was/dlls/ole32/storage32.c is/dlls/ole32/storage32.c
--- was/dlls/ole32/storage32.c Mon Feb 4 17:31:22 2002
+++ is/dlls/ole32/storage32.c Tue Feb 5 22:11:20 2002
@@ -5615,7 +5615,7 @@
/* prepare the file name string given in lieu of the root property name */
GetFullPathNameW(pwcsName, MAX_PATH, fullname, NULL);
memcpy(newStorage->filename, fullname, PROPERTY_NAME_BUFFER_LEN);
- newStorage->filename[PROPERTY_NAME_BUFFER_LEN] = '\0';
+ newStorage->filename[PROPERTY_NAME_BUFFER_LEN-1] = '\0';
/*
* Get an "out" pointer for the caller.
diff -ur was/dlls/ole32/storage32.c is/dlls/ole32/storage32.c
--- was/dlls/ole32/storage32.c Mon Feb 4 17:31:22 2002
+++ is/dlls/ole32/storage32.c Tue Feb 5 22:11:20 2002
@@ -5615,7 +5615,7 @@
/* prepare the file name string given in lieu of the root property name */
GetFullPathNameW(pwcsName, MAX_PATH, fullname, NULL);
memcpy(newStorage->filename, fullname, PROPERTY_NAME_BUFFER_LEN);
- newStorage->filename[PROPERTY_NAME_BUFFER_LEN] = '\0';
+ newStorage->filename[PROPERTY_NAME_BUFFER_LEN-1] = '\0';
/*
* Get an "out" pointer for the caller.
