On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 08:22:26PM -0700, Kevin P. Fleming wrote: > His source networks were all 10.1.1.0/24, Addresses were changed. > so he could easily remap to the 172.16.0.0/12 space and have room > for thousands of NAT'ed networks (probably more than his system can > handle). For that matter, he could remap to a large portion of > 10.0.0.0/8 and have room for more networks than VLANs can even > support (4096, IIRC). Yes, 4096 VLANs is a good point. 10/8 gives 64k /24 networks. I would not use that if the original networks actually are in 10/8 however, to avoid all the potential problems and confusion of mixing the original addresses with the mapped ones. Since the original poster wrote "numerous" and did not specify exact addressing setup, I wanted to at least mention the scalability issue. Thanks! :) //Peter
