On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 10:50 PM Cole Robinson <crobinso@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 2/22/19 3:40 AM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: > > This series add support for *network* (--location) unattended > > installations of a few OSes that libosinfo/osinfo-db provides support > > for: > > - Fedora; > > - CentOS; > > - RHEL; > > - Debian; > > - openSUSE; > > - Ubuntu*; > > > > *: Ubuntu needs some pending patches for osinfo-db; > > > > One example** of how to perform a unattended installation is: > > `virt-install \ > > --name fedora29 \ > > --os-variant fedora29 \ > > --unattended profile=desktop` > > > > **: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libosinfo/2019-February/msg00173.html > > is needed in order to have the example above working properly > > > > Thanks for the work and sorry for the review delay. I've pushed this > series now with some minor pylint and bug fixes sprinkled into your patches. > > On top I added some more work, the main chunk was moving most of the > osdict.py into their own classes/functions in unattended.py, and adding > some unit tests to cover most of the virtinst/ bits > > > The TODO list: > > - Work on Linuxes medias ("--cdrom") unattended installations: > > This will make me bump libosinfo dep to 1.4.0 and we'll also require > > some patches for osinfo-db; > > Instead of bumping the dep, let's just throw an error if an unattended > install is attempted but libosinfo is too old to work. Look at > unattended.py OSInstallScript __init__ for an example > > > - Work on Windowses medias ("--cdrom") unattended installations: > > - Tests, tests, tests ... > > - Update man-pages > > > > Another piece to consider: the script is generated in a predictable path > ~/.cache/virt-manager/fedora.ks for example. It's not likely to happen > but two virt-install runs could overwrite each others scripts here. I'd > expect the generated filename to be sometime like tmpfile output. One thing that we could easily do is generate the script in ~/.cache/virt-manager/<random_generated_per_vm_name>/fedora.ks ... The problem we had in the past, if my memory is not playing tricks on me, is that some distros (or Windows?) expected a specific filename. Although it my not apply to initrd injection. > > It wasn't clear to me how to actually ask libosinfo to write to a > different pathname though, and we would likely need to extend the initrd > inject logic to handle file rename before injection or something like > that. But it's worth considering If the generating a <random_generated_per_vm_name> works well, we can just generate it here[0] and be happy as it wouldn't colide: https://github.com/virt-manager/virt-manager/blob/master/virtinst/unattended.py#L243 Does this approach look okay? > > Thanks, > Cole Best Regards, -- Fabiano Fidêncio _______________________________________________ virt-tools-list mailing list virt-tools-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list