On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:16 AM Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 04:23:54PM +0100, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: > > This series introduces a new option to virt-install: > > virt-install --name GuestName --os-variant fedora29,install=location > > ---------------- > > | > > v > > The new bit! > > We already have a "--location" arg that gives an installation tree > location, and a --cdrom arg that gives an ISO image local path (historically > it would allow a URI too IIRC). > > I'm wondering if there's a need to combine all these different ways to > specifying the install tree/media location into a more general purpose > arg Dan, this was suggested by Cole during the review of (please, see the first item): https://www.redhat.com/archives/virt-tools-list/2019-February/msg00051.html I don't have a strong opinion on whether we should go for adding location as part of "os-variant" or just get the location from osinfo-db whenever a --location is passed without actually having a URL. [snip] _______________________________________________ virt-tools-list mailing list virt-tools-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list
