On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 12:06:11PM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > On Fri, 2019-02-01 at 10:47 +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 01:12:15PM +0400, marcandre.lureau@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > -SPICE_GTK_REQUIRED="0.35" > > > +SPICE_GTK_REQUIRED="0.36" > > > > This version of spice-gtk doesn't exist in any repositories at this > > time. Instead of bumping the version, please make the code use > > conditional compilation. This patch has currently broken the build > > on all platforms. > > Not arguing against conditional compilation, but this made me think: > would it make sense for us to build spice-gtk on the CentOS CI along > with all other projects? Spice has their own CI setup, but I think it could still be useful to build spice-gtk in our CentOS CI so that we can validate that changes to it don't accidently cause build regressions for virt-viewer. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| _______________________________________________ virt-tools-list mailing list virt-tools-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list
