Re: vhostmd - virtio channel support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/08/2018 05:58 AM, Trapp, Michael wrote:
On 08.06.18, 10:31, "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

     On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 04:23:32PM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
     > On 06/07/2018 09:42 AM, Trapp, Michael wrote:
     > > I fully understand the requirements regarding coding style and the way the changes should be split and discussed in detail,
     > > but may I ask you to provide some general feedback about the basic concept and if this an option at all before we start discussing the details.
     >
     > vhostmd already supports 'vbd' and 'xenstore' as transports for the metric
     > data. Adding another virtio-channel based transport is a great idea IMO.
     >
     > WRT writing the data to the various channels, I suppose it is possible to do
     > that even if there is no (immediate) recipient for the data? The vbd and
     > xenstore transports don't have a protocol so to speak. The data is simply
     > written to the disk or xenstore node regardless if there is someone to
     > consume it. Can the virtio transport work the same? If so, that would
     > alleviate the need for polling all the fds and the static list of
     > epoll_event. In virtio_metrics_update() we could simply connect to all the
     > channels, write the data, close them, and repeat on the next update period
     > (which is every 5sec by default).
Why push it to the guest at a fixed frequency, rather than just letting the
     guest query the host at whatever rate it feels it needs ?
content on virtio channel is not discarded. I've setup a simple test and a continuous write on host side blocks when ~123kB are buffered from OS + QEMU.

Ok, we definitely don't want to mindlessly stuff data in the channel from the host side :-).

A delayed read on the VM side contains the whole buffered data.
Looks like the virtio based approach needs a query from the VM to guarantee that the VM get's the current metrics.

Agreed. Would be nice to avoid the MAX_CHANNELS build-time limit. If nothing else it could be a config file option.

Regards,
Jim

_______________________________________________
virt-tools-list mailing list
virt-tools-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Virtualization]     [KVM Development]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]

  Powered by Linux