On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko) <etrunko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 08/02/2016 01:17 PM, Christophe Fergeau wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 06:40:23PM -0300, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko) wrote: >>> I have pushed the first two patches of the series because they were >>> already acknowledged and were pretty much self-contained. >>> >>> I tried to replace GtkTreeView in favor of new GtkListBox, but after some >>> painful work, I decided to drop it because it is not possible to >>> reproduce the exact same behavior of the former with the latter. For >>> instance, once we have a GtkRadioButton activated, it is not possible to >>> deactivate it. >> >> For what it's worth, I'm not sure we should keep GtkRadioButtons at all >> cost in the list, imo they look not so nice. Dunno if it would be >> possibe to have either empty column or check mark instead of a >> GtkRadioButton. >> > > Well, I am no UI expert, but it seems to me that radio buttons are the > best choice to express the behavior of the list, exactly 1 or 0 item can > be active at any given time. With check buttons, user is given the > impression that more than once can be selected, which is not the case. I do agree with Eduardo here. I have the feeling that radio buttons are the most suitable option here. [snip] Best Regards, -- Fabiano Fidêncio _______________________________________________ virt-tools-list mailing list virt-tools-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list
