Okay, I've pushed this patch now with that bit dropped Thanks, Cole On 06/16/2016 10:33 AM, Jovanka Gulicoska wrote: > It doesn't make a difference. I've missed it. > > Thanks, > Jovanka > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 1:24 AM, Cole Robinson <crobinso@xxxxxxxxxx > <mailto:crobinso@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > On 06/14/2016 05:52 PM, Jovanka Gulicoska wrote: > > Changes since v1: split long lines, remove unnecessary call of tick(), > > remove code cleanup > > --- > > virtManager/connection.py | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > virtManager/storagepool.py | 4 +++- > > 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > diff --git a/virtManager/storagepool.py b/virtManager/storagepool.py > > index b099fbe..b39fcfb 100644 > > --- a/virtManager/storagepool.py > > +++ b/virtManager/storagepool.py > > @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ class vmmStorageVolume(vmmLibvirtObject): > > ########################## > > > > def _conn_tick_poll_param(self): > > - return None > > + return "pollpool" > > def class_name(self): > > return "volume" > > > > This bit is still here, does it actually make any difference? I don't think it > should be required, but I haven't tested > > Thanks, > Cole > > > _______________________________________________ virt-tools-list mailing list virt-tools-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list
