Trying to remove a disabled timer or handle will cause virt_viewer_events_remove_{handle,timeout}() to return an error rather than removing it. Based on commit 79699d73e6e1b7218e3bd8349d176752f86128b9 from libvirt-glib. Original author: Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> Related to: rhbz#1243228 --- src/virt-viewer-events.c | 20 +++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/virt-viewer-events.c b/src/virt-viewer-events.c index fe3aaa6..44740c3 100644 --- a/src/virt-viewer-events.c +++ b/src/virt-viewer-events.c @@ -233,12 +233,11 @@ virt_viewer_events_remove_handle(int watch) g_debug("Remove handle %d %d", watch, data->fd); - if (!data->source) - goto cleanup; - - g_source_remove(data->source); - data->source = 0; - data->events = 0; + if (data->source != 0) { + g_source_remove(data->source); + data->source = 0; + data->events = 0; + } /* since the actual watch deletion is done asynchronously, a update_handle call may * reschedule the watch before it's fully deleted, that's why we need to mark it as @@ -409,11 +408,10 @@ virt_viewer_events_remove_timeout(int timer) g_debug("Remove timeout %p %d", data, timer); - if (!data->source) - goto cleanup; - - g_source_remove(data->source); - data->source = 0; + if (data->source != 0) { + g_source_remove(data->source); + data->source = 0; + } /* since the actual timeout deletion is done asynchronously, a update_timeout call may * reschedule the timeout before it's fully deleted, that's why we need to mark it as -- 2.4.4 _______________________________________________ virt-tools-list mailing list virt-tools-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list