On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 09:56:21AM -0500, Jonathon Jongsma wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-06-02 at 16:29 +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> > ---
> > virt-viewer.spec.in | 8 +++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/virt-viewer.spec.in b/virt-viewer.spec.in
> > index dfc819c..b75ac45 100644
> > --- a/virt-viewer.spec.in
> > +++ b/virt-viewer.spec.in
> > @@ -104,7 +104,13 @@ autoreconf -if
> > %define govirt_arg --with-ovirt
> > %endif
> >
> > -%configure %{spice_arg} %{gtk_arg} %{govirt_arg} --with-buildid=%{release} --disable-update-mimedb
> > +%if 0%{epoch}
> > +%define buildid %{epoch}:%{release}
> > +%else
> > +%define buildid %{release}
> > +%endif
> > +
> > +%configure %{spice_arg} %{gtk_arg} %{govirt_arg} --with-buildid=%{buildid} --disable-update-mimedb
> > %__make %{?_smp_mflags}
> >
> >
>
>
> It doesn't seem that virt_viewer_compare_buildid() currently handles the
> epoch? It'd be good to add a test case for that.
Yes, it does not handle it, I initially added that patch as it makes
sense, and forgot to avoid sending it /o\
Christophe
Attachment:
pgpdKjpDO8338.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ virt-tools-list mailing list virt-tools-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list
