On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 01:36:50PM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
>> Whenever we reach this branch while connecting we will create a new
>> spice session (from the dialog showed to the user). So, destroying the
>> channel on this situation seems sane enough.
>> It also avoids an error dialog to be popped out twice with (basically)
>> the same information.
>>
>> Related to: rhbz#1085216
>> ---
>> src/virt-viewer-session-spice.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/virt-viewer-session-spice.c b/src/virt-viewer-session-spice.c
>> index 851d2f6..10dd149 100644
>> --- a/src/virt-viewer-session-spice.c
>> +++ b/src/virt-viewer-session-spice.c
>> @@ -610,7 +610,7 @@ virt_viewer_session_spice_main_channel_event(SpiceChannel *channel,
>> spice_session_connect(self->priv->session);
>> }
>> } else {
>> - g_signal_emit_by_name(session, "session-disconnected", error ? error->message : NULL);
>> + virt_viewer_session_spice_channel_destroy(NULL, channel, session);
>
> Are the SPICE_CHANNEL_ERROR_IO, SPICE_CHANNEL_ERROR_LINK,
> SPICE_CHANNEL_ERROR_TLS below different or should they also destroy the
> channel rather than emitting a "session-disconnected" signal?
That's a good question :-)
Let me try to reach those errors and see if we can destroy the channel
instead of emitting a "session-disconnected" signal.
>
> Christophe
>
> _______________________________________________
> virt-tools-list mailing list
> virt-tools-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list
Best Regards,
--
Fabiano Fidêncio
_______________________________________________
virt-tools-list mailing list
virt-tools-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list
