Re: [PATCH 1/2] Do not show a display when virt-viewer --direct fails

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christophe,

On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 03:54:08PM +0100, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
>> When --direct fails the expected behavior is to report an error and
>> close the dialog, instead of the current behavior, that shows a dialog
>> and waits for the guest to connect.
>
> Is it specific to --direct though? It looks to me that we should never
> try to wait if virt_viewer_update_display() fails. I think we used to do
> that before commits 6100d08 / 9e2f9ea0

Hmmm. Interesting, at least :-)
I have tested the behavior before that commits and looks like it must
be specific to --direct. The other cases should wait for a VM.

Best Regards,
-- 
Fabiano Fidêncio

_______________________________________________
virt-tools-list mailing list
virt-tools-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Virtualization]     [KVM Development]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]

  Powered by Linux