On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Well, I beg to disagree on the 'easy to read' part as I would not have split
it if I had found it that easy to read ;)
I agree, the original code is not so easy to read, the rewritten version however is.
"fairly small" and "easy to read" are really secondary to "one change by
patch", which I don't think the initial patch achieved.
It is a rewrite, really no steps involved when I did it, it's hard to come up with steps which I think are artificial, but as I said, let's go with your 3 patches then
--
Marc-André Lureau
_______________________________________________ virt-tools-list mailing list virt-tools-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list
