Re: virt-manager only adecuate for IPv4 networks?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2014-10-03 10:39, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 06:28:44AM -0300, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote:
> > I've been trying to set up a simple VM with network (Internet) connectivity on
> > my laptop.
> > 
> > I've come across series of issues, after which I'm starting to believe that
> > virt-manager is oriented towards IPv4-only networks, since non of it's options
> > work with IPv6: NAT has (luckily/finally) obsoleted by IPv6 and bridging does
> > not work on wireless networks.
> > 
> > I've seen some guides here and there were users configured their machines as
> > routers, with radvd, manual routing, etc. That's a bit of a pain because:
> > 
> >  * It requires a not-so-short series of steps which I must redo every time I
> >    connect to a different network (since I'll have different IP addresses,
> >    different routes, etc).
> >  * The whole point of virt-manager is to make this "user friendly", and not so
> >    complicated.
> > 
> > Am I missing something? Are there any plans to address this in future? Is there
> > something I can do to work around this?
> 
> Given the lack of NAT for IPv6 what behaviour would you suggest
> virt manager attempt to do for IPv6 ?  If there are suggestions
> we're listening, but I've not heard any satisfactory suggestions
> for a "just works" setup with IPv6 that's on a par with what we
> are able todo with IPv4 NAT.
> 
> Regards,
> Daniel
> -- 
> |: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
> |: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
> |: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
> |: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|

IMO, the real problem is that wireless clients can't have two MACs (and hence,
can't bridge). But I don't see that changing in future.

I think what would work aroundn this issue is:

 * Grab a second IP address on the host machine on the same subnet. eg: my
 machine gets it's IP via RA. It's quite possible to simply grab a second IP on
 the same subnet that RA is advertising.
 * Set up something like radvd on the virtual network that's set up for the
 guest. Give it that same IP, and forward any DNS that were picked up via RA.
 * Forward all traffic to this second IP to the guest machine.

This doesn't seem to conflict with any standard (AFAIK), and should work fine
on roaming clients (eg: laptops). I think the only scenario where this may not
work is were static IPs are used and there's no RA present.

Cheers,

-- 
Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
A: Because we read from top to bottom, left to right.
Q: Why should I start my reply below the quoted text?

Attachment: pgpX0DqJ585lw.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
virt-tools-list mailing list
virt-tools-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Virtualization]     [KVM Development]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]

  Powered by Linux