----- Original Message ----- > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 09:36:15AM +0100, Christophe Fergeau wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 01:02:25PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > > > From: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > If Spice proxy requires authentication, ask credentials and try > > > connecting again. > > > --- > > > configure.ac | 3 +-- > > > src/virt-viewer-session-spice.c | 38 > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > > > 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac > > > index 7a00bf4..5ee49fb 100644 > > > --- a/configure.ac > > > +++ b/configure.ac > > > @@ -1,4 +1,3 @@ > > > - > > > AC_INIT([virt-viewer],[0.6.0]) > > > AC_CONFIG_SRCDIR(src/virt-viewer-main.c) > > > AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR([m4]) > > > @@ -19,7 +18,7 @@ GTK2_REQUIRED="2.18.0" > > > GTK3_REQUIRED="3.0" > > > GTK_VNC1_REQUIRED="0.3.8" > > > GTK_VNC2_REQUIRED="0.4.0" > > > -SPICE_GTK_REQUIRED="0.22" > > > +SPICE_GTK_REQUIRED="0.23.21" > > > > ACK, though I'm not sure we want to have virt-viewer depend on spice-gtk > > git. Probably better to wait until next spice-gtk release before pushing > > this? > > NACK to this change. The virt-viewer GIT codebase must *always* build > against the latest stable Fedora releases. F20 only has 0.22, so this > change must not be made unless F20 gets a newer spice-gtk release in > its stable updates repo. > This is either asking for latest spice-gtk in f20, which can be a bit risky, or waiting for a few cycles. Is this really the way to handle development of such tight projects? Imho, it would be nicer if at least, you would consider virt-viewer master to build with rawhide. _______________________________________________ virt-tools-list mailing list virt-tools-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list
