On 13/01/14 04:49 AM, Digimer wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to sort out a significant performance hit I am getting
with a LUKS partition inside a KVM VM (host is RHEL 6.5, guest is also
RHEL 6.5).
Inside the VM, I get ~1.1 GB/sec write speed:
====
Inside the VM! (48 GB, 4x vCPUs, 500MB /boot, 40 GB /, 4 GB <swap>, RHEL
6 minimal, no selinux/iptables)
Write to raw partition using: sync; dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/vda5 bs=4M
count=80000; sync
- 335544320000 bytes (336 GB) copied, 302.885 s, 1.1 GB/s
- 335544320000 bytes (336 GB) copied, 293.905 s, 1.1 GB/s
- 335544320000 bytes (336 GB) copied, 289.298 s, 1.2 GB/s
Write to ext4 partition using: sync; dd if=/dev/zero
of=/mnt/data/zeros.out bs=4M count=80000; sync
- 335544320000 bytes (336 GB) copied, 290.855 s, 1.2 GB/s
- 335544320000 bytes (336 GB) copied, 347.901 s, 964 MB/s
- 335544320000 bytes (336 GB) copied, 317.877 s, 1.1 GB/s
====
When I created the LUKS partition though, I got substantially lower
speed:
====
[root@vm01-ng-rhel01 ~]# cryptsetup -v status vda5
/dev/mapper/vda5 is active.
type: LUKS1
cipher: aes-cbc-essiv:sha256
keysize: 256 bits
device: /dev/vda5
offset: 4096 sectors
size: 1729118208 sectors
mode: read/write
Command successful.
(killed the 'dd' when I realized how slow it was going)
sync; dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/mapper/vda5 bs=4M count=80000; sync
48330964992 bytes (48 GB) copied, 345.72 s, 140 MB/s
====
I noticed that the real CPU on the host:
====
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 62
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2637 v2 @ 3.50GHz
stepping : 4
cpu MHz : 3500.087
cache size : 15360 KB
physical id : 1
siblings : 8
core id : 4
cpu cores : 4
apicid : 41
initial apicid : 41
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 13
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca
cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall
nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good
xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx
smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm pcid dca sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt
tsc_deadline_timer aes xsave avx f16c rdrand lahf_lm ida arat epb
xsaveopt pln pts dts tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid fsgsbase smep
erms
bogomips : 6998.99
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
====
Has a lot more features (I see 'aes' in particular) than inside the VM:
====
processor : 3
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 13
model name : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
stepping : 3
cpu MHz : 3499.998
cache size : 4096 KB
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 4
wp : yes
flags : fpu de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov
pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx lm unfair_spinlock pni cx16
hypervisor lahf_lm
bogomips : 6999.99
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
====
Should I (can I?) be passing some of these features up to the guest to
improve LUKS performance?
Thanks!
I copied the extensions of the host, and 'aes' showed in the guest's
cpuinfo, to the VM and got somewhat better numbers;
Write to raw LUKS partition using: sync; dd if=/dev/zero
of=/dev/mapper/vda5 bs=4M count=80000; sync
- 335544320000 bytes (336 GB) copied, 1157.27 s, 290 MB/s
Still a far cry from what the base system can do.
Thoughts?
Thanks!
--
Digimer
Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/
What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without
access to education?
_______________________________________________
virt-tools-list mailing list
virt-tools-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list
