On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 03:47:50PM -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote: > I am not sure how much interest there would be so I am not sure if > the effort would be worth it but, has there ever been any > consideration been given to adding hercules and s390 virtuals under > virt-manager? Just curious? Maintaining a new libvirt backend is a non-trivial amount of work. The s390 architecture has very few users, and hercules probably even less. If someone wants to write a driver and commit to supporting it over the long term then great, but I can think of many more productive ways to spend dev effort that impact more users than s390 ever will Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| _______________________________________________ virt-tools-list mailing list virt-tools-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list
