Re: [Spice-devel] More on virt-viewer for windows

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,
>>> Can someone from the Spice community chime in? Why is
>>> spice-space.org shipping a Fedora 18 build of libvirt (0.10.2.x)
>>> rather than Fedora 19 (1.0.5.x)? Who does the builds, and how often
>>> are they updated? 
>> I do builds when releasing new virt-viewer versions, and I use the latest
>> stable Fedora available at that time. We've not done any virt-viewer
>> release since F19 came out.
>>
>> There's no reason why I couldn't do bug fix re-builds of the installer
>> though at any time if deemed neccessary.
> It would be nice to do a bug fix rebuild as soon as 0.10.2.8 is
> released, as that would pick up the patch for mingw refusing to create
> sockets, and hopefully get people a lot further at actually being able
> to use virsh on mingw.
I got confused by those release numbers: if Fedora has libvirt 1.0.5.x
why should the next windows build use older 0.10.2.8? I though
development were being done only on the latest releases.


[]s, Fernando Lozano

_______________________________________________
virt-tools-list mailing list
virt-tools-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Virtualization]     [KVM Development]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]

  Powered by Linux