Hi On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> I would like to know what is the purpose of the leading 0. > > It is simply part of the version number, (major, minor, micro). > That it is zero simply means I've not considered us to be at > version 1.0.0 yet. It doesn't indicate that the leading 0 is > unused. What would you consider to be 1.0.0 ? Why not just 1.0? >> We could use a different package name and version scheme, but then we >> probably want to use different path etc. That will make it harder to >> switch between one and the other I suppose. > > Well I'd really recommend that as a community project, ovirt shouldn't > build custom installers, instead use the official one we provide. I > understand if RHEV wants to build an installer, as part of its product, > but then I don't see that a productized installer is something we need > to care about as upstream from the POV of upgrade paths, and I'd really > expect them to use a different name too "rhev-virt-viewer" or something > to indicate that its a productized branch. Well, upstream would have the same issue if it would have a "stable" release of some sort. I tend to favour being as closed to upstream as possible, instead of having our own product in RHEVM (more work, more complexity). But perhaps, it's the way to go. -- Marc-André Lureau _______________________________________________ virt-tools-list mailing list virt-tools-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list
