On 07/10/2013 03:56 PM, Leonardo Augusto Guimarães Garcia wrote: > On 07/10/2013 02:03 PM, Cole Robinson wrote: >> Thanks, I pushed the first two. But see below. >> >> On 07/10/2013 12:14 PM, Leonardo Garcia wrote: >>> From: Leonardo Garcia <lagarcia@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> --- >>> man/virt-manager.pod | 2 +- >>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/man/virt-manager.pod b/man/virt-manager.pod >>> index f8e4d4b..a33955e 100644 >>> --- a/man/virt-manager.pod >>> +++ b/man/virt-manager.pod >>> @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ Standard GTK options like --g-fatal-warnings are also >>> accepted. >>> =head1 AUTHOR >>> -Written by Daniel P. Berrange and Cole Robinson. >>> +Written by Daniel P. Berrange, Cole Robinson, and Leonardo Garcia. >>> =head1 BUGS >>> >> I always took this to mean 'virt-manager authors' and not specifically 'man >> page authors', but it appears there's examples of both in the wild. It's tough >> to do lists like this without overlooking someone or creating maintenance >> burden. My recommendation for this in order is: > Hehe, I always thought that patches including the patch's author name in an > AUTHOR section or in an AUTHORS file were a little bit petulant. :) > > Sorry that I could not resist this time. In fact, I agree with you that the > AUTHOR section should mean 'virt-manager authors'. In this case I got a little > bit confused because looking in the man page change history, I could only find > you and Daniel making changes on the file, while we have many others > contributing to virt-manager. However, to be very honest here, you both have > done the majority of the work in virt-manager and, because of that, deserve to > have your names listed in the AUTHOR section. > > That said, I think we can just stay where we are. :) > I just went ahead and dropped all AUTHORS sections in the man pages. - Cole _______________________________________________ virt-tools-list mailing list virt-tools-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list