On 03/25/2013 08:11 AM, Gene Czarcinski wrote: > On 03/23/2013 09:18 PM, Doug Goldstein wrote: >> So really just trying to understand what the release roadmap is. Right >> now its been about 8 months since the last release of virtinst and >> virt-manager. There's 37 patches in virtinst since the last release >> and virt-manger has 42. Depending on the time frame of the GTK+3.2 >> branch release, I think there's an advantage to doing a virtinst >> 0.600.4 and virt-manager 0.9.5. But there's really 3 ways to go. A >> basic bug fix release, looking at all the distros we're all carrying >> anywhere from half-dozen to a dozen patches or a full master release >> or wait until the GTK+ 3.2 release is ready. I'll be glad to put >> together the proposed patchset for the bug fix release and send it to >> the list if that's the route people want to go. >> > I believe there are a few stoppers before a new virt-manager based on the > gtrk3.2 branch can be released. > > 1. virt-manager-tui is broken. > > 2. The Gtk/Gdk color stuff does not work. > Can you be more specific here? I don't know what you mean offhand. > While you can run the new virt-manager from a clone of the git, there appear > to be a few things to be done so that it can be distributed as a tarball or > rpm. I believe that python-distutils-extra is being used in place of > autotools for packaging but I have no idea how to do that. > > In general the gui side does work and I have had few problems implementing my > future patch/patches to implement IPv6 support and a few other things dealing > with networking and the glade-3 ui's. > Right, the gtk3 branch isn't quite ready, but it's in a close enough state that I'm happy to cut a final gtk2 release and commit to the next release being based on the gtk3 merge work. - Cole _______________________________________________ virt-tools-list mailing list virt-tools-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list
