Hi,
On 03/21/2013 03:16 PM, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 01:36:59PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
With commit 81ed9d13 "virt_viewer_window_enter_fullscreen: Pass in monitor for
fullscreen window" we need a monitor number to determine where to move
the window when going fullscreen.
Since the VirtViewerDisplay needs to know the fullscreen monitor number too,
to determine the fullscreen size it was being stored there. But we don't
always have a display, leading to errors like:
(remote-viewer:7996): remote-viewer-CRITICAL **:
virt_viewer_display_get_monitor: assertion `VIRT_VIEWER_IS_DISPLAY(self)'
failed
And to the monitor number not always being stored. This patchset fixes this
by storing the monitor number inside VirtViewerWindow, and passing it to
VirtViewerDisplay only when we've a display.
Patch by itself seems ok, however this makes me wonder if all of this is
not papering over that we are doing trying to do too much with
VirtViewerWindow too early (ie before we have a display)?
No being able to have *a* window before the spice-display-connection is ready is
by design, so that we've something to show the user while the connection is
being established.
Regards,
Hans
_______________________________________________
virt-tools-list mailing list
virt-tools-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list
