On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 03:15:33PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > Hi, > > It might be worthwhile to check for required client version before > establishing connection. > > (I don't think it's worth to check for each capabilities and protocol > version, this would only explose the number of combinations. I think > it is better to assume that the min. requirement are checked during > configure - assuming the respective backend needed are compiled-in, > otherwise there is already a protocol required check error) As with previous posting, IMHO, feature based checks are far better than any version checks, precisely because of the assumption you mention above - we should not be assuming people turn on every feature at configure time. Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| _______________________________________________ virt-tools-list mailing list virt-tools-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list