On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 10:55:07AM +0100, Christophe Fergeau wrote: > On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 02:44:55PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > While I don't object to having patches posted to virt-tools-list for > > some programs that don't get many patches, like virt-manager and > > python-virtinst, the overwhelming number of libosinfo patches on this > > list makes the list very hard to read. > > > > See the archives: > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/virt-tools-list/2012-December/thread.html > > > > I think libosinfo should now have its own mailing list, at least for > > patches. > > Hopefully things will calm down soon ) But I don't mind using a dedicated > list, I understand the too high traffic can be annoying. I think it'd be worth having a dedicated list at this time. Previously libosinfo was just an experiment, but now it is becoming an established viable project, it merits its own list Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| _______________________________________________ virt-tools-list mailing list virt-tools-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list
