On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 02:44:55PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > While I don't object to having patches posted to virt-tools-list for > some programs that don't get many patches, like virt-manager and > python-virtinst, the overwhelming number of libosinfo patches on this > list makes the list very hard to read. > > See the archives: > https://www.redhat.com/archives/virt-tools-list/2012-December/thread.html > > I think libosinfo should now have its own mailing list, at least for > patches. > > Rich. > Fair Point. I absolutely agree. Marwan _______________________________________________ virt-tools-list mailing list virt-tools-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list
