On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 03:51:59PM +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Christophe Fergeau >> <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 07:39:05PM +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: >> >> From: "Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)" <zeeshanak@xxxxxxxxx> >> > In particular, is pygtk >> > able to handle it? I seem to remember some problems there. >> >> I was told that this should work with python bindings at least and >> when I reported back that it works with Vala bindings out of the box, >> tomeu on #introspection was impressed. :) If it doesn't actually work >> for pygtk, its really not our problem as long as >> gobject-instrospection (from Boxes POV, vapigen) supports it and can >> handle it nicely. > > Well, we want libosinfo to work nicely from python, so if it was something > that cannot work in pygtk, it would be better to avoid using that, just as > we'd avoid things that are not convenient for vala. I don't see why this can't work for pygtk since python supports lists and objects and list of objects. In practice, I'm told that it already works and if it doesn't, it means that there is a *fixable* bug in the bindings. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124
