On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 06:13:57AM +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/data/oses/gnome.xml >> @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ >> +<libosinfo version="0.0.1"> >> + >> + <os id="http://gnome.org/3.6";> >> + <short-id>gnome3.6</short-id> >> + <name>GNOME 3.6</name> >> + <version>3.6</version> >> + <vendor>GNOME Project</vendor> >> + <family>linux</family> >> + <distro>gnome</distro> >> + >> + <media arch="i686" live="true"> >> + <url>http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/misc/promo-usb/GNOME-3.6.0.iso</url> >> + <iso> >> + <volume-id>GNOME36-LiveCD</volume-id> >> + <system-id>LINUX</system-id> >> + </iso> >> + <kernel>isolinux/vmlinuz0</kernel> >> + <initrd>isolinux/initrd0.img</initrd> >> + </media> >> + >> + <resources arch="all"> >> + <minimum> >> + <n-cpus>1</n-cpus> >> + <ram>805306368</ram> > > This.. > >> + </minimum> >> + >> + <recommended> >> + <cpu>400000000</cpu> >> + <ram>1207959552</ram> >> + <storage>9663676416</storage> > > ...and this are the fedora values I think. Yes, as at least right now its mostly just fedora with different names and package collection AFAIK. > Can this ISO be installed to disk? Nope. > (downloading one atm) I couldn't see any RAM/disk recommendations on > http://www.gnome.org/getting-gnome/ , so it's probably better to only have > a <minimum> node with some arbitrary memory requirement (and a comment > saying so), and to get rid of this <recommended> node. Agreed. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124
