On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 05:03:42AM +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: > On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Another version of RNG adaptation. > > diff to v1: > > -Dan's suggestions worked in > > > > If you find this the right approach, please push as I don't > > have commit access (yet :) ). > > ACK'ed and pushed! > > > NB: As I was at this, there is something we should do about > > <x-*/> elements as RNG doesn't allow regexp over element > > names so we will constantly get errors about unknown child > > element. My suggestion is to switch to <x name="[a-z]+"/>. > > Thoughts? > > Makes sense. Don't know if anyone is actually using those already so > wonder if we should remain backwards compatible here. Another option might be to just declare an alternative namespace for them. eg <xxx:name> then people can use whatever they want as element names, without clashing. I think this is preferable to any of the other options Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
