On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 04:43:34PM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 04:27:01PM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > > >> >> If the dirname argument is NULL, the output files will be written in the > >> >> current directory. > >> > > >> > I think we could probably just make that an parameter flag > >> > instead eg. > >> > > >> > # osinfo-install-script --output-dir /some/dir win2k3r2 > >> > > >> > >> eorry, i didn't understand your point. > >> could you try to clarify it a bit more for me? > > > > IIUC, currently you have output dir as a parameter > > > > # osinfo-install-script OSNAME FILENAME OUTPUT-DIR > > > > I'm suggesting using a flag > > > > # osinfo-install-script --output-dir OUTPUT-DIR OSNAME > > As I did, we have: > > # osinfo-install-script --output-dir OUTPUT-DIR --output-file FILENAME OSNAME > > we agreed in remove --output-file, right? Yes. > about output dir i'm working in this way: > if OUTPUT-DIR is passed, the path will be OUTPUT-DIR, else, the path will be "." > do you agree with this behavior? Ok, yes, that's good. I was mis-reading the options you had configured. Sorry for the confusion Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
