On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 06:44:21PM +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: > From: "Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)" <zeeshanak@xxxxxxxxx> > > This function was adding the second list elements to new list first so > the order of elements in the new list was contrary to what user will > expect of this function (and all wrapper/using functions). > --- > osinfo/osinfo_list.c | 10 +++++----- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) ACK, this patch makes total sense, irrespective of the rest of the interesting discussions in this thread. Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
