On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 05:22:20PM +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Christophe Fergeau
> <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 02:37:07AM +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
> >> From: "Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)" <zeeshanak@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> ---
> >> osinfo/libosinfo.syms | 1 +
> >> osinfo/osinfo_os.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> osinfo/osinfo_os.h | 4 ++++
> >> 3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/osinfo/libosinfo.syms b/osinfo/libosinfo.syms
> >> index de1ff18..8e2d929 100644
> >> --- a/osinfo/libosinfo.syms
> >> +++ b/osinfo/libosinfo.syms
> >> @@ -109,6 +109,7 @@ LIBOSINFO_0.0.6 {
> >> osinfo_os_new;
> >> osinfo_os_get_devices;
> >> osinfo_os_get_all_devices;
> >> + osinfo_os_get_device_by_property;
> >> osinfo_os_get_device_links;
> >> osinfo_os_add_device;
> >> osinfo_os_get_family;
> >> diff --git a/osinfo/osinfo_os.c b/osinfo/osinfo_os.c
> >> index 0facb08..ec7886a 100644
> >> --- a/osinfo/osinfo_os.c
> >> +++ b/osinfo/osinfo_os.c
> >> @@ -238,6 +238,47 @@ OsinfoDeviceList *osinfo_os_get_all_devices(OsinfoOs *os, OsinfoFilter *filter)
> >> }
> >>
> >> /**
> >> + * osinfo_os_get_device_by_property:
> >> + * @os: an operating system
> >> + * @property: the property of interest
> >> + * @value: the required value of property @property
> >> + * @inherited: Should devices from inherited and cloned OSs be included in the
> >> + * search.
> >> + *
> >> + * A utility function that gets the first device found from the list of devices
> >> + * @os supports, for which the value of @property is @value.
> >> + *
> >> + * Returns: (transfer full): The found device or NULL
> >> + */
> >> +OsinfoDevice *osinfo_os_get_device_by_property(OsinfoOs *os,
> >> + const gchar *property,
> >> + const gchar *value,
> >> + gboolean inherited)
> >> +{
> >> + OsinfoDevice *ret;
> >> + OsinfoDeviceList *devices;
> >> + OsinfoFilter *filter;
> >> +
> >> + filter = osinfo_filter_new();
> >> + osinfo_filter_add_constraint(filter, property, value);
> >> +
> >> + if (inherited)
> >> + devices = osinfo_os_get_all_devices(os, filter);
> >> + else
> >> + devices = osinfo_os_get_devices(os, filter);
> >> + g_object_unref (filter);
> >
> > Don't you get a warning if you don't do g_object_unref(G_OBJECT(filter)); ?
> > (same comment for the g_object_unref(devices) below)
>
> Nope, should I be?
It probably depends on your CFLAGS, but I'm quite sure I got warnings
in some occasions without the casts.
>
> >> +
> >> + if (osinfo_list_get_length(OSINFO_LIST(devices)) > 0)
> >> + ret = OSINFO_DEVICE (osinfo_list_get_nth(OSINFO_LIST(devices), 0));
> >
> > I think it would be better to return the full list and let the app decide whether
> > it wants the first item in the list or more than that.
>
> I guess, we can provide another function 'get_devices_by_property' as well..
What kind of properties do we get? Does it really make sense to only return
the first one and ignore the other results? I don't know what kind of
results this function returns, so hardcoding in the library this kind of
"arbitrarily pick one result, drop the rest" makes me uncomfortable.
Christophe
Attachment:
pgp0twkB7110r.pgp
Description: PGP signature
