On 05.08.2015 04:16, Christian Rodriguez wrote:
El 04/08/15 a las 05:25, Klaus Schmidinger escribió:
On 04.08.2015 08:12, Christian Rodriguez wrote:
Hello everyone! I'm from Argentina, and up to last month I've been using VDR 1.7.262 with an ISDB-T USB adapter. It works really good, but the last week I've been trying to upgrade to VDR 2.2 and I've found a problem with ISDB-T cards: they are not supported.
As I'm really interested in using VDR, I was digging inside the code and found a partial solution for this problem: as ISDBT is the same as DVBT, I've changed the way delivery system is queried. My changes are applied in a cloned repo at github:
https://github.com/chrodriguez/vdr/commit/dadbca57c2dc55c1c53b4fa8f68b56728ab72ddd#diff-8fe0655a5feb333a97bf3a2a8b451546R1294
That's the only change I've made. Now I can enjoy my fresh upgraded VDR installation!!
I think a better refactor should be made, but for now it's working perfectly deployed as a docker container: https://registry.hub.docker.com/u/chrodriguez/vdr
If it works for you this way, I'll adopt this change in the next version.
Surely there should be a better implementation, since ISDB-T has several
tuning parameters of its own. But since there is no such signal here I can't
implement/test this myself. Somebody with the proper hardware/signal/knowledge
would have to do that.
I've tried to follow vdr code, and I think I shall add specific code to dvbdevice.c, specially:
* GetRequiredDeliverySystem
* cDvbTuner::SetFrontend
* cDvbDevice::QueryDeliverySystems
* cDvbDevice::ProvidesSource
That sounds about right.
Is there any developer guide for VDR so I can read it before trying to understand directly from code?
There's just the source ;-).
Klaus
_______________________________________________
vdr mailing list
vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
