>>> >>> Hi, >>> FYI, I noticed this behaviour here with vdr-2.0.6 and french HD channels. >>> Karim >> >> Can you make a small sample (like a minute or so) of such a recording >> available? >> Klaus >> >> >> Of course. >> Please download sample from here : >> >> https://www.dropbox.com/sh/i9c732ukwl925md/AAC6J2H6RL6F5JIQNeouxPUIa > > I have tested this sample with both VDR 2.1.1 and 2.1.6, and in both > cases 'vdr --genindex..." creates an index file that is about twice > the size of your file and thus appears to be correct. > > Was this sample taken from the very beginning of your recording or > somewhere in the middle? Maybe the error is only caused by a specific > sequence in the stream, which is not contained in the sample. > If you can produce a sample where vdr's --genindex option generates a > faulty index file, please let me know. > > Klaus > > > I think that sample is from very beginning, what I am not totally > sure. I will try to check again. > Could you please tell me how I can detect a "faulty index" ? If you encounter a recording where the time shown in the progress display is not correct, the index is most likely wrong. In such a case please do as follows: - change into the *.rec directory of that recording - rename the file index to index.old (or whatever you like) - run the command vdr --genindex=`pwd` (`pwd` will be replaced by the name of the current directory) - do an ls -l index* and compare the size of the old and new index file. If they are the same, that means that --genindex produces the same index file as did the original recording, and thus I should be able to reproduce the problem here if you send me the first minute of that recording. Klaus It's clear, thank you. Karim _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
