|
Am Sonntag, 1. Dezember 2013, 11:44:42 schrieb Klaus Schmidinger: > I wanted to get this out of the core VDR code. It was > a makeshift solution in times where disk sizes were still relatively small. > Nowadays we have disk sizes in the terabyte range, which should be enough for > a VDR.
It is certainly not enough for me, and I will never run VDR without being able to spread directories over disks. I always have several disks, right now 4 of them. When the capacity of modern disks sharply increases, I remove my oldest disk or the one most aged (smartctl) and add a new one. Over the years, this has proven to be very simple and reliable. Your removal of functionality makes that impossible. IMHO, RAID is not practical for that situation, and I do not really trust RAID and probably never will.
something like aufs should make it much easier to use VDR video data over network file systems, even by non-vdr software. A vdr plugin enabling more than one file system would not be adequate, it would still lock users with more than one video disk into having to use vdr or vdr-specific plugins on all clients even if all they want to do is just viewing recordings. The clients needs a unified view over all vdr video directories.
and of course such a plugin is reinventing the wheel with all those unionfs variants around.
-- Wolfgang |
_______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
