On 05.09.2013 13:07, Thomas Maass wrote:
... Some class declarations, for example the class cMenuRecording are declared in the sourcefile. So plugin developers cannot use them easily. Why don't you move this declarations to the headerfiles? There are also most class members declared as private. So plugin developers have to implement most things themself. Why aren't they protected? Maybe you have a good reason for that. As a plugin newbie I have to copy all the vdr classes I wanna use, instead of easily deriving it. An example of this would be cMenuRecordingItem or cRecording. But there are many other classes, which could be used in plugins.
These classes were never meant to be "derived from". If I make, e.g., cMenuRecordingItem a virtual base class, there would also have to be a way of having a derived cMenuRecordings create instances of the derived cMenuRecordingItem instead of its own. I'm afraid this would make things unnecessarily complex. These are VDR's own menu implementations, and if somebody doesn't like them, there's always things like "extrecmenu" etc. In the core VDR I'd like to keep things simple and basic. In one of the upcoming develoepr versions I plan to implement a way to freely configure the menu of VDR, and even use plugin provided replacements of the standard menus. Maybe this will help... Klaus _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
