|
On 8/11/2013 11:43 AM, Brian-Imap
wrote:
On
8/8/2013 10:22 PM, Lars Hanisch wrote:
Am 08.08.2013 16:23, schrieb Brian-Imap:
On 8/7/2013 9:58 PM, Lars Hanisch wrote:
Hi,
Am 07.08.2013 21:04, schrieb Brian-Imap:
Hi,
I now a have a 4 Tuner Cine S2 setup that I want to run
with 3 cables, I want to keep the fourth cable for a test
VDR.
Reading about this I only see how to do it together with
the Dynamite Plugin, is that correct that I must use that
Plugin to get it to work for VDR?
I am currently running a plain VDR setup on Ubuntu, with
very few plugins and had no need for the Dynamite Plugin
up till now.
You don't really need dynamite. If you want to omit the
fourth tuner (in kernel count order), you can start vdr with
the -D parameter (see vdr --help).
vdr -D0 -D1 -D2 <other parameters as usual>
Regards,
Lars.
Cheers Brian
_______________________________________________
vdr mailing list
vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
_______________________________________________
vdr mailing list
vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
Hi Lars,
OK I knew about this, but I thought that the Card/Tuners
numbers could change
from boot to boot. Are you saying that they will not change?
If it's one bridge with 4 tuners, I doubt their order will
change.
You may want to read about "device bonding", where you split
one cable on two tuners so they share polarisation and
band, but may be tuned to different transponders.
But I'm a cable user, I don't know much about it, just that
there are some people out there who use it successfully. :)
Regards,
Lars.
Cheers Brian
_______________________________________________
vdr mailing list
vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
_______________________________________________
vdr mailing list
vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
Hi,
thanks for the tips, unfotunately I ended up needing to keep using
a FF Card for a short while.
So I followed the CT tip and added a TT C-2300 Cable FF card that
is not connected to cable at all.
That part seems to work really well.
Using the -D parameter in VDR I limited VDR to using the first 4
DVB Devices and this is what it gave me:
Aug 11 11:09:31 localhost vdr: [936] frontend 0/0 provides
DVB-S,DVB-S2,DSS with QPSK ("STV090x Multistandard")
Aug 11 11:09:31 localhost vdr: [936] frontend 1/0 provides DVB-C
with QAM16,QAM32,QAM64,QAM128,QAM256 ("ST STV0297 DVB-C")
Aug 11 11:09:31 localhost vdr: [936] frontend 2/0 provides
DVB-S,DVB-S2,DSS with QPSK ("STV090x Multistandard")
Aug 11 11:09:31 localhost vdr: [936] frontend 4/0 provides
DVB-S,DVB-S2,DSS with QPSK ("STV090x Multistandard")
So tuners 1-3 of the Cine S2 and Duoflex are now in use. DBV
device 1 provides nothing but MPEG output.
I guess I'll keep an eye on the DVB device ordering for a while to
see how it goes.
Cheers Brian
_______________________________________________
vdr mailing list
vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
Hi,
well the DVB device numbering is not consistent:
"VDR-Test-Cellar(SDA2): 15:25 [995] frontend 3/0 provides
DVB-S,DVB-S2,DSS with QPSK (""STV090x Multistandard"")"
"VDR-Test-Cellar(SDA2): 15:25 [995] frontend 2/0 provides
DVB-S,DVB-S2,DSS with QPSK (""STV090x Multistandard"")"
"VDR-Test-Cellar(SDA2): 15:25 [995] frontend 1/0 provides DVB-C
with QAM16,QAM32,QAM64,QAM128,QAM256 (""ST STV0297 DVB"
"VDR-Test-Cellar(SDA2): 15:25 [995] frontend 0/0 provides
DVB-S,DVB-S2,DSS with QPSK (""STV090x Multistandard"")"
"VDR-Test-Cellar(SDA2): 05:10 [1018] frontend 3/0 provides
DVB-S,DVB-S2,DSS with QPSK (""STV090x Multistandard"")"
"VDR-Test-Cellar(SDA2): 05:10 [1018] frontend 2/0 provides DVB-C
with QAM16,QAM32,QAM64,QAM128,QAM256 (""ST STV0297 DV"
"VDR-Test-Cellar(SDA2): 05:10 [1018] frontend 1/0 provides
DVB-S,DVB-S2,DSS with QPSK (""STV090x Multistandard"")"
"VDR-Test-Cellar(SDA2): 05:10 [1018] frontend 0/0 provides
DVB-S,DVB-S2,DSS with QPSK (""STV090x Multistandard"")"
"VDR-Test-Cellar(SDA2): 06:52 [1080] frontend 3/0 provides DVB-C
with QAM16,QAM32,QAM64,QAM128,QAM256 (""ST STV0297 DV"
"VDR-Test-Cellar(SDA2): 06:52 [1080] frontend 2/0 provides
DVB-S,DVB-S2,DSS with QPSK (""STV090x Multistandard"")"
"VDR-Test-Cellar(SDA2): 06:52 [1080] frontend 1/0 provides
DVB-S,DVB-S2,DSS with QPSK (""STV090x Multistandard"")"
"VDR-Test-Cellar(SDA2): 06:52 [1080] frontend 0/0 provides
DVB-S,DVB-S2,DSS with QPSK (""STV090x Multistandard"")"
"VDR-Test-Cellar(SDA2): 19:16 [1015] frontend 3/0 provides
DVB-S,DVB-S2,DSS with QPSK (""STV090x Multistandard"")"
"VDR-Test-Cellar(SDA2): 19:16 [1015] frontend 2/0 provides
DVB-S,DVB-S2,DSS with QPSK (""STV090x Multistandard"")"
"VDR-Test-Cellar(SDA2): 19:16 [1015] frontend 1/0 provides DVB-C
with QAM16,QAM32,QAM64,QAM128,QAM256 (""ST STV0297 DV"
"VDR-Test-Cellar(SDA2): 19:16 [1015] frontend 0/0 provides
DVB-S,DVB-S2,DSS with QPSK (""STV090x Multistandard"")"
Up till now it has not been a problem, the one without a cable must
be 4/0. Still I am wondering if this can be controlled?
Before VDR start unload the DVB drivers, then load DVBTTPCI first
and give it a short delay and then load DDBridge maybe?
Still, then is it then guaranteed that DDBridge will number its 4
tuners correctly?
Cheers Brian
|
