On 08.04.2013 19:42, Lucian Muresan wrote: > On 08.04.2013 10:36, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: >> Am I getting this right? cDvbHdFfDevice::ScaleVideo() apparently sets the >> video window in units of 1/1000 of the OSD width and height, respectively. >> Since this resolution is less than the possible acual OSD width or height, >> the rectangle actually used in this function might be different from the >> one given in the Rect parameter. While this is, of course, allowed, >> shouldn't >> the same calculations also be done in cDvbHdFfDevice::CanScaleVideo(), >> to return >> the correct rectangle to the skin? > > I think if the actual cDvbHdFfDevice::CanScaleVideo implementation would > have really calculated something, it should have only converted > internally to whatever needed (1/1000 in this case), and back to Osd > pixel dimensions before returning the value. Since it doesn't (as it > just returns the input rectangle, possibly because the device "is" able > to handle any size within the limits, maybe nothing should be changed. > Or maybe checking against the limits could be done, changed the size to > a reasonable default (like Null for full size) and log an error if the > input size wasn't within the Osd limits. > Udo's variant looks well, but for all this maybe Andreas Regel should > also be consulted. Btw, I sent him a PM on vdr-portal.de, he did not > react so far. > > Regards, > Lucian Hi, I will look into this shortly. Best regards Andreas _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
