Re: New Makefile system

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 24.03.2013 14:15, Tobi wrote:
> On 24.03.2013 13:51, Lucian Muresan wrote:
> 
>>>>> I searched for the segfault in the code but the reason was the make,
>>>>> and that costs me some days.
> 
> There's not very much which go wrong. As long as the plugins are
> compiled with -fPIC and -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 there should be no ABI
> incompatibilities.
> 
> I can understand your frustration - changing a myriad of packages is an
> annoying task (been there - done that! :-)
> 
> But after all I think the new Makefile is much better and for the first
> time works out of the box with the standard Debian packaging tools
> (which require *FLAGS, DESTDIR, PREFIX and so on).
> 
> Packaging is much easier right now as you basically only have to do:
> 
> make all PREFIX=/ ...
> make install DESTDIR=...
> 
> And for plugins that haven't migrated to the new Makefile the only
> change I had to do was:
> 
> export CXXFLAGS += $(shell pkg-config vdr --variable=cxxflags)
> 
> The only thing I'm missing is a CPPFLAG in the Makefiles, which I hope
> gets added in 2.0+X.
> 
> But I'm talking from the Debian/Ubuntu perspective only - things might
> be slighty more complicated in Gentoo.

Well, see my other answer to Christopher, where I explained what can go
wrong (which of course, doesn't have to happen if using plain vanilla VDR).

Regards,
Lucian


_______________________________________________
vdr mailing list
vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Util Linux NG]     [Xfree86]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux