On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Dominic Evans <oldmanuk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 25 August 2012 20:54, Timothy D. Lenz <tlenz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> The problem here in the US is, DVB is not a standard for anything. > > I'm guessing Klaus' problem here is that he doesn't live in the US so > can't access ATSC broadcasts for testing, so it doesn't really make > sense for him to attempt to maintain it in VDR core :) > > Where is the current home for the ATSC plugin and who is/was the > original maintainer? Ideally it needs a US-based maintainer, but > (failing that) it should at least be migrated to somewhere more public > (e.g., github or vdr-developers) so that bugs/issues can be tracked. It would be nice if it were moved to vdr-developers. I don't think the author would even have a problem with that. The real drawback for NA is that while there are plenty of users, there's practically no coders here. The ones I know have either left VDR, or dvb altogether. Thankfully there has been some EU coders willing to throw us a bone and help out occasionally. With their help, and Klaus, NA VDR is far less painful today that in the past. :) _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr