On 02.03.2012 12:54, Frank Schmirler wrote:
On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 11:08:42 +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote
On 01.03.2012 09:38, Frank Schmirler wrote:
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 21:33:31 +0100, Udo Richter wrote
Am 29.02.2012 16:17, schrieb Klaus Schmidinger:
+ The function cDevice::Receiving() now returns true if there is any
receiver
attached to the device. Its boolean parameter has no meaning any more.
Please remember to drop the following line from PLUGINS.html, as it
is now finally completely void:
(any negative value will allow a cReceiver to be detached from its cDevice
at any time.)
This was handled via Receiving(true).
This still leaves the live related receivers unhandled, and since
there's no way to port the 'volatile' patch without reverting your
changes, we still have the old osdteletext-channel-blocking bug.
Wouldn't it help to run those live related receivers with priority
IDLEPRIORITY and having cDevice::Receiving() ignore receivers with priority
IDLEPRIORITY?
Wouldn't that get us back to square one? ;-)
Well, no. Previously live TV and related receivers were treated the same way
(same priority, both handled as if they were not present). Currently we have
different priorities (-1 and -99) and both are not ignored. So the -99
receiver is not in the way when switching live TV, but it will have an impact
on device selection. Ignoring receivers with IDLEPRIORITY (or likewise
MINPRIORITY) would solve this.
But where would that be different from the previous version, where
all receivers with negative priorities have been ignored?
Now I'm confused...
Klaus
_______________________________________________
vdr mailing list
vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
