On Wednesday 29 February 2012 - 17:50:27, Tony Houghton wrote: > On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 16:48:33 +0100 > Manuel Reimer <manuel.reimer@xxxxxx> wrote: > > Klaus Schmidinger wrote: > > > Yes, the next stable version will be 2.0. > > > Version 1.0 was the "SD version", and version 2.0 shall be the "HD > > > version" ;-). > > > > > > I'll see to make "client/server" a priority after that. > > > > What does this mean? Do you plan built-in networking support or do > > you plan to improve streamdev? IMHO it is a big task to make really > > good networking support. Keeping this code separate (means: A plugin) > > isn't a that bad idea, I think. Of course, this plugin could be > > delivered directly with VDR, like the other "built-in" plugins. > > I don't think a plugin is enough. I agree. I think, it is evident not confuse plugin-networking with client/server networking. OK, currently the client/server support works only through plugins, as there is no vdr-frontend - but Klaus should not care about plugin- networking on designing client/server functionality. C/S-communication should be completely private to vdr - just like internal communication. Plugins may keep on doing their networking, i.e. to connect other frontends like xine or whatever - but that's not the internal communication, vdr relies on. > For better client-server VDR needs to support multiple clients watching > different channels with different OSDs simultaneously. Yeah, that would be very nice :) kind regards Gero _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
