On 2 January 2012 10:19, VDR User <user.vdr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 1:31 PM, René <linuxtv@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> There was talk of this some time ago, though I don't think anything >>> solid came of it. I personally am not interested in it unless ram came >>> be used for the buffer storage. Having a harddrive (or even worse, an >>> ssd) in a constant write state 24/7 is not something I'd like to do. >>> Whatever the case, I think you'll be stuck with the patch for a while. >> >> I have set my livebuffer to use 2gb memory (hdd). If i would have 4gb ram >> (now i have just 1gb), then i would use a 2gb ramdisk for livebuffer, and >> the rest for my system. This would be more than enough.. :-) But having a >> patch working for vdr is ok too :-) > > RAM is cheap enough now days that having plenty of it isn't a problem > for most people. For example, 4GB will cost you less than a few hours > at the pub with friends. :) The OP probably meant to have the option to use RAM directly without fiddling with a RAM disk setup. -- -Tor _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
