Just looked at the trace I
sent in my initial post and realised that I had selected a Diseqc command that
I had modified while trying to diagnose the situation so my annotations <
> were a bit misleading. The following should be less
confusing: Diseqc command list found =
t v [E0 10 38 F4] W500 [E0 31 6B 04] W250 [E1 31 6B 04] W15 T Diseqc action = ""> Diseqc action = ""> Diseqc action = ""> Sending Diseqc command: E1
31 6B 04 < Wrong, should be E0 10 38 F4 > Diseqc action = ""> Sending Diseqc command: E1
31 6B 04 < Wrong, should be E0 31 6B 04 > Diseqc action = ""> Sending Diseqc command: E1
31 6B 04 Diseqc action = ""> Again, the final Diseqc command has been
sent three times, not the three commands in the sequence they appear in the
command list. Apologies for the confusion. Mark. |
_______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr