On 13.05.2011 23:47, Udo Richter wrote:
> Am 13.05.2011 07:44, schrieb Tobi:
> Interestingly irritating... Since I don't have an GCC4.6 at hand, I
> *think* the source of the problem might be that cCursesFont has just an
> default constructor.
Right. The C++ standard explicitly requires an "user-declared default
constructor" here.
> So it should also work if you add an empty
> constructor cCursesFont::cCursesFont() { } ???
Yes. Either this or -fpermissive. But personally I prefer the initializer
here, but I must admit I don't understand the technical reason, why the
standard requires a user defined default constructor at all.
Tobias
_______________________________________________
vdr mailing list
vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
