On 27.12.2010 14:10, Oliver Schinagl wrote: > >> On 19.12.2010 02:46, Oliver Schinagl wrote: >>> I have created a channel.conf from dvbscan and used the built update >>> function from VDR. >>> >>> All channels seem to be added/modified properly, but the FTA channels >>> are different. Instead of modifying my current entry, it created new ones. >>> >>> Nederland 1;Digitenne:546000000:C12D12M64B8T8G4Y0:T:27500:0000:0000:0000:0:1101:8720:2214:0 >>> Nederland 1;Digitenne:546000000:C12D12M64B8T8G4Y0:T:27500:7011:7012:7013:0:1101:8720:2211:0 >>> Nederland 2;Digitenne:546000000:C12D12M64B8T8G4Y0:T:27500:0000:0000:0000:0:1102:8720:2214:0 >>> Nederland 2;Digitenne:546000000:C12D12M64B8T8G4Y0:T:27500:7021:7022:7023:0:1102:8720:2211:0 >>> Nederland 3;Digitenne:546000000:C12D12M64B8T8G4Y0:T:27500:0000:0000:0000:0:1103:8720:2214:0 >>> Nederland 3;Digitenne:546000000:C12D12M64B8T8G4Y0:T:27500:7031:7032:7033:0:1103:8720:2211:0 >>> >>> I took the liberty of expanding the VID, AID and TID from 0 to 0000 so >>> they'd align better in this e-mail only. >>> >>> All entries work however! Which baffles me. How can something without >>> vid/aid work at all? Also, it seems that the 'proper' entry doesn't >>> display EPG data at all. Ironically, the scrambled channels all seem to >>> work just fine. Any clues on this? >> The channels with zero PIDs have a TID (Transport stream ID) of 2214, ehile >> those with actual PIDs have 2211. Only one of these can be right, I guess. > > Yip, I changed the TID to 2214 to get both epg info and not have VDR > re-add it over and over again. Question remains, why does dvbscan and > vdr-backgroundscanner find different TID's :S That's a good question - let me know if you have the answer ;-) Klaus _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
