Am Montag, den 13.12.2010, 00:29 +0100 schrieb Joerg Bornkessel: > > Am Samstag, den 25.09.2010, 13:15 +0200 schrieb Joerg Bornkessel: > > > [â] > > > >> [2] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/asneeded.xml > > > Should `LDFLAGS` also be passed to the compiler when building the > > plugins? > > We have this fixed global on Gentoo for all plugins. > All plugin Makefile's are sed'ed/patched to use the LDFLAGS. Sorry, I do not know Gentooâs build system. I found the patch for VDR [1] and the ebuild file [2]. I was wondering why skincurses had no patch applied or change regarding `LDFLAGS` [3] and for example vdr-burn [4] has a separate patch. Then I found `vdr-plugin.eclass` [5] where the replacement is done using `sed`. > > I made a patch from your message which does not include any changes to > > the plugins. > > I dont know, what distri you use, I am using the OpenEmbedded framework [6]. > one way would be to fix this in the make.global ( used up from > vdr-1.7.(not shure yet)) and inherit this in the plugin Makefile. > > Should be standard in the vdr-1.7.x adapted plugin Makefiles That is what my patch is for. I will send an updated patch. Thanks, Paul [1] http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/media-video/vdr/files/vdr-1.6.0-ldflags.patch?view=markup [2] http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/media-video/vdr/vdr-1.6.0_p2-r5.ebuild?view=markup [3] http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/media-plugins/vdr-skincurses/ChangeLog?view=markup [4] http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/media-plugins/vdr-burn/files/vdr-burn-0.2.0_beta1_ldflags.diff?revision=1.1&view=markup [5] http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/eclass/vdr-plugin.eclass?view=markup [6] http://www.openembedded.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
