Am Sonntag, den 12.12.2010, 16:29 +0100 schrieb Klaus Schmidinger:
> On 20.11.2010 11:39, Joachim Wilke wrote:
> > 2010/11/19 Hans-Peter Jansen <hpj@xxxxxxxxx>:
> >>> The HISTORY file states:
> >>> "Include paths are now added instead of overwriting INCLUDES in the
> >>> Makefile"
> >>>
> >>> However, in the Makefile changes:
> >>> -INCLUDES = -I/usr/include/freetype2
> >>> +INCLUDES ?= -I/usr/include/freetype2
> >>>
> >>> Shouldn't that be += instead of ?=.
> >>
> >> No, the conditional variable assignment operator ?= allows one to
> >> replace this variable via command line/environment.
> >
> > Thats not what the HISTORY reads. Either the Makefile or the HISTORY
> > should be changed.
>
> This change was posted here on the list by Paul Menzel on 2010-04-05.
The link to the message in the archive is [1].
> I guess the phrase "Include paths are now added instead of overwriting..."
> in the HISTORY was my fault.
>
> @Paul: would it be ok with you to make this
>
> INCLUDES += -I/usr/include/freetype2
>
> instead of
>
> INCLUDES ?= -I/usr/include/freetype2
Reading my commit message,
In some environments, i. e. when cross building, include files
are not located in the standard path like
`/usr/includes/freetype2`. Make it possible to provide the
correct path without needing to patch `Makefile`.
I would say that it would not work when cross compiling. I am no expert
though. I would recommend to change the entry in HISTORY and I will ask
on openembedded-devel what they suggest.
Thanks,
Paul
[1] http://www.linuxtv.org/pipermail/vdr/2010-April/022831.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
