Hi Am Samstag, 13. November 2010 schrieb Steffen Barszus: > On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 23:10:23 +0100 > > Dieter Hametner <dh+vdr@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The live-plugin has support (contributed by third party developer) > > for SSL connections to its internal web-server. See the README file > > in LIVE for more details. > > > > The concept how LIVE works as plugin could be generalized to provide > > a 'generic' (SVDRP like) access via xml-http(s)-requests or via JSON > > etc. > > I like this idea a lot - additional advantage is that the access that > way should be easier for the accessing applications. > > > The general disadvantage of such an approach is, that it creates an > > 'officially unsupported' way to control VDR remotely. I mean it does > > not get 'standardized' by Klaus :) > > As long as more than one project is using this, it should be fine. Well the LIVE plugin could make use of this new infrastructure :) That could be number one but it is not a promise :) Tadi -- Dieter Hametner dh (plus) vdr (at) gekrumbel (dot) de live plugin developer http://live.vdr-developer.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
