On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Timothy D. Lenz <tlenz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The rotor plugin doesn't seem to be maintained anymore and was always > somewhat of a hack to vdr. Seems to me rotor control should really be a part > of vdr diseqc control code. Just about every sat box out there includes > rotor control function. I've seen numerous people make the same request and although I don't use a rotor myself, I do agree support for it should be included in vanilla VDR as it's a basic common function & equipment. I'll guess that if enough people reply to this thread that Klaus may add it to his TODO list (assuming it isn't there already). > I would also like to see it be able to handle a rotor per card. Not much > point in having several sat tuners if they all have to look at the same sat. I'm sure if Klaus decides to implement this, he'll do it in such a way that makes the most sense & flexibile usability to maximize the benefit of adding it. No point in adding more functionality if you leave it crippled. :) Cheers _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
